-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
internal/lsp: fix incorrect line and start of semantic tokens #376
Conversation
This PR (HEAD: c778e32) has been imported to Gerrit for code review. Please visit https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/396715 to see it. Tip: You can toggle comments from me using the |
Message from Gopher Robot: Patch Set 1: Congratulations on opening your first change. Thank you for your contribution! Next steps: Most changes in the Go project go through a few rounds of revision. This can be Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
Message from Peter Weinberger: Patch Set 1: (1 comment) Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
Message from Hironori Ebe: Patch Set 1: (1 comment) Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
Message from Peter Weinberger: Patch Set 1: (2 comments) Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
This PR (HEAD: 15b9727) has been imported to Gerrit for code review. Please visit https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/396715 to see it. Tip: You can toggle comments from me using the |
15b9727
to
6eedc7c
Compare
This PR (HEAD: 6eedc7c) has been imported to Gerrit for code review. Please visit https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/396715 to see it. Tip: You can toggle comments from me using the |
Message from Hironori Ebe: Patch Set 2: (1 comment) Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
Message from Hironori Ebe: Patch Set 3: (1 comment) Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
Message from Peter Weinberger: Patch Set 3: Run-TryBot+1 Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
Message from Gopher Robot: Patch Set 3: (1 comment) Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
Message from kokoro: Patch Set 3: Kokoro presubmit build starting for golang/tools/gopls-legacy/presubmit Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
Message from kokoro: Patch Set 3: gopls-CI+1 Kokoro presubmit build finished with status: SUCCESS Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
Message from Gopher Robot: Patch Set 3: TryBot-Result+1 (1 comment) Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
Message from Peter Weinberger: Patch Set 3: Code-Review+2 Trust+1 (1 comment) Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
Message from Peter Weinberger: Patch Set 3: (2 comments) Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
Message from Robert Findley: Patch Set 1: Run-TryBot+1 Trust+1 Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
Message from Suzy Mueller: Patch Set 3: Trust+1 Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/396715. |
Current implementation returns incorrect result when some of the items are skipped, because positions could be relative to a skipped item. Instead, each position must be relative to the previous item added to the result. Change-Id: I3c1a68d37bf0c9cfc1bccfe6f76c25b536224293 GitHub-Last-Rev: 6eedc7c GitHub-Pull-Request: #376 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/396715 Run-TryBot: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com> gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com> Trust: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com> Trust: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
This PR is being closed because golang.org/cl/396715 has been merged. |
Current implementation returns incorrect result when some of the items are skipped, because positions could be relative to a skipped item. Instead, each position must be relative to the previous item added to the result.